Saturday, April 26, 2008

Thank you Britannica

I just registered to get a subscription to Britannica online via a brand new initiative to share their content with web bloggers and others. Lets hope they let me in. In the mean while I've added their enviroment related information widget. Hope it works.

Thursday, April 24, 2008

My personality on 24th April

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.
Free Jung Word Choice Test (similar to MBTI)
personality tests by similarminds.com

Monday, April 21, 2008

Is a moral element fundamental to effective management? | Slow Leadership

He had a wonderful blog about "The Coyote within", but sadly is now no longer available. Now in his new "Slow Leadership" blog he asks searching questions - Adrian Savage.

One example below.

"If amorality coincides with a lust for immediate gratification — as it surely does today — is it possible that corporations and individuals may mistake their best interests, focusing on short-term gain in ways that harm their long-term welfare? Should we stand back and let them ruin themselves in this way, even if many innocent people are also hurt in the process?"

I can't answer this. My weasly way out is to say -- Pray.

What are you NOT focusing on?

"You didn’t see anything blue cuz you were so focused on the brown"

Can it be a coincidence that sh-t and the earth both are brown (most of time unless you have "foreign substances").

Brian / Mr. Robbins have a point when they say you see only what you focus on. In my experience most of the time we do not focus on the brown in our lives because it is something that is always there just behind our everyday awareness and we are afraid to look too closely.

Focussing on the brown is absolutely essential - isn't it what philosophers call "the examined life". The trick or rather the way forward is pretty clear once that examination and dare I say repentance is done. Then you will need what Brian says here - whale training.

Failure as learning

"Where do we start?!!? Well, failing, of course!"

Nice idea. I was really big on failing and teaching kids in school how to fail properly. Especially in my country, India where every examination season lots of children talke their lives. Teaching how to fail as an idea seemed to me to be exactly what our rat-race preparation centers (a.k.a. schools) need.

Now I think no matter what I do success or failure only partly depends on my actions.

Let G-d flow through me as Brian said here.

Your Primary Question is probably not very important

"How can I let God flow thru me?
THAT is a MUCH MUCH MUCH better question to ask myself when faced with a stressful situation, no?"

You know it is easy for a lazy guy like me to criticize some one so let me thank Brian for all his hard work in collecting these rather interesting ideas.

Now todays idea is that when faced with stress you need to ask the correct question to come out through it.

I agree one hundred percent. What I disagree with is Brian's question. This probably is due to the fact that Brian has the word 'G-d' in his question. For me G-d is not something that flows through me when I make a choice.

My cry when facing stress would be "G-d save me".

Now all of you can beat me up.

Baby steps are not always good

"why in the world would we not praise the “baby steps” we take as we learn something new"

A baby learning to walk is part of life as we know it. A group of scientists taking their first baby steps to create the A-bomb is also part of life in this world.

Once again this idea is just not enough to guide us in life.

The end of Reinforcement both Positive and Negative

"We need continuous positive reinforcement in order to change our behavior."

What can I say to Brian here, reinforcement to change behaviour to the good is good. But how does one know what is the good for one. That is the question?

A relatively beningn example of reinforcement (can be call it teaching obedience) of whales being trained to jump ropes was presented. How about the shocking obedience created in human beings in the experiments by Dr. Stanley Milgram.

So maybe the reinforcement and the one doing it should be careful.

Smiling with your fear

"All the greats feel the same fear we do. They just know how to smile with it"

I can't find anything to add to this idea. Still since I have to blog about it -- there is something to be said about not confronting the fear till you are ready. Sometimes a fear is a perfectly valid thing to have about a decision and you need to stay with it. So the idea would be not to ignore the fear or quickly take action and get over it, but to "dialog" with it, learn what it has to say.

A healthy fear is what kept over cavepeople ancestors from getting eaten.

Richard Koch: 80/20 but not for Babies

"See where you spend your time. See where you get your results. Is it 50/50 or more like 80/20?"

For this idea, I really have no idea if this is true. My supplement would be that if you 20% of what you do gets 80% of your result, it does not mean that 80% of what you do should be relegated to the sidelines of your life.

I don't know if this is the right application of the idea but here goes. If 20% of the time you spent with the family is counted as most valuable 80% (quality time), does it follow that you should ignore the remaining 80% of the regular boring non quality just being there kind of time.

If 20% of your friends form 80% of your time spent on friends does that mean you can safetly ignore or put in second place those other friends.

What I am trying to say that you can apply formulae like this to people and probably ideas.

Just wondering which 20% of the 500 ideas in Brian's list are the most valuable so I can just kick them first. ;-)

Feeding Your RAS is not enough

"Make sure you’re feeding your RAS the right stuff"

Whether what Brian is say about the reticular activating system is right or wrong, I somehow feel that the mind is not so simplistically modelled. There is an element of truth to the idea that you see and pay attention to the things you expect to see.

Here too however what you need to ask yourself is whether the good I want to see for me will be good for the whole. If you consider this in a context reduced to you or those close to you only, you may be misled into thinking that if you look for the good then your looking for the good will "trickle-down" to the whole.

What you want and what you will do

Idea number 2 from Brian is in brief, be clear about what you want and what you are willing to do to get there.

My criticism is that, without a framework of what you are and what is good for you to guide you, what you want will in all probability not be what is really good for you.

Second, if you do not have a good framework for thinking about what it is you want then it follows that you will probably not bother too much about the means you take to get there.

Much blood and sorrow have flow in this world because of such - on the face of it - determined and courageous people.

Sunday, April 20, 2008

thinkArete is not enough

This is a series I hope to do in which I rant against all the big ideas here from my confused and not so politically correct partially westernized Indian Christian persective (is there anything like that?). Thanks to Brian for so painstakingly collecting them here.

Idea 1 (a very brief extact only, read it in full)
"Live to your highest potential--moment to moment to moment."

In a damaged world for broken human beings this is somewhat difficult because often without outside help we do not know what exactly is our highest potential.

Also another echo of this idea is the invisible hand of market economics where Adam Smith (I have not read his book so what I know is only from secondary sources) states that every person seeking their own economic interest will lead the market to its most optimum state. This is patently not true, witness the recent troubles of the sub-prime meltdown in the U.S.A.

My conclusion is that purely on your own without a careful yet dynamic "presence" of the context (family, neighbouhood, society, culture, God) in your decision about your highest potential, you have a very high potential to damage yourself and your context.

I would love to hear what you think.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

A Common Morality :: Eric Weislogel :: Global Spiral

Maritain says that difference between people logical thinking should not preclude them working together if they practical outcomes from very different ways of thinking are the same.

Differences should not be papered over to obtain cordiality of intercourse but hairsplitting for the sake of itself is madness. A small quote below from Eric Weislogel's thought provoking article at Global Spiral.

"If a state of peace worthy of the name, firm and enduring, is to be established one day among the peoples of the world, this will depend not only upon the economic, political and financial arrangements reached by diplomats and statesmen, nor will it depend solely upon the juridical building up of a truly supra-national co-ordinating organism endowed with efficient means of action; it will depend also upon the deep adherence of men’s consciousness to practical principles like those I have recalled"

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

from How the World works

"How did we get to the point that the failure of one firm can bring us to the edge of collapse, our whole financial markets? We know the Fed and others did not do their job in regulating lending practices and supervising the risks banks were taking on, but how do you let the entire financial system become so fragile that it could not tolerate one failure?"

Thursday, April 3, 2008

The Problem of Growth, Sociology and the Early Church

Jeff Vail says here that :

"If hierarchies gain any advantage in growing in relation to their peers (e.g. peer polity competition), or if they gain any advantage in 'doing it wrong' (e.g. abusing their component humans), then history shows very convincingly that they will do just these things."

My take on that is that the history of Christianity at least early Christianity shows a growing hierarchy not just not abusing but actively working to benefilt its constituent members and others.


Jeff has said elsewhere that for the rhizome (which he suggests is a practical alternative to hierarchy) to work :

".. Additionally, it is important to recognize the cultural programming that hierarchal systems provide, and to consciously reject and replace parts of this with a myth, taboo, and morality that supports rhizome and discourages hierarchy. Rules are inherently hierarchal—they must be enforced by a superior power, and are not appropriate for governing rhizome. However, normative standards—social norms, taboos, and values—are effective means of coordinating rhizome without resorting to hierarchy. For example, within the context of anthropological self-awareness, it would be considered “wrong” or “taboo” to have slaves, to be a lord of the manor, or to “own” more property than you can reasonably put to sustainable use. This wouldn’t be encoded in a set of laws and enforced by a ruling police power, but rather exist as the normative standard, compliance with which is the prerequisite for full participation in the network. .."

Many be religion is the answer but he is just to shy to say so.