The link is a review  of the book, "The Master and His Emissary" by Ian McGilchrist. 
 Two short extracts from the article.
 "... He questions the accepted doctrine that the left hemisphere (Left  henceforward) is necessarily dominant, the practical partner, while the right  more or less sits around writing poetry. He points out that this  "left-hemisphere chauvinism" cannot be correct because it is always Right's  business to envisage what is going on as a whole, while Left provides precision  on particular issues. Moreover, it is Right that is responsible for surveying  the whole scene and channelling incoming data, so it is more directly in touch  with the world. This means that Right usually knows what Left is doing, but Left  may know nothing about concerns outside its own enclave and may even refuse to  admit their existence."
 ".. This notion, which now involves seeing everything natural as an object,  inert, senseless and detached from us, arose as part of the dualist vision of a  split between body and soul. It was designed to glorify God by removing all  competing spiritual forces from the realm of nature."
 A right use of both people and things must  therefore involve some resonance with the spirit of  both?
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment